Protein Structure
Lecture 12 PPT
🧬 MS for Structural Proteomics – Lecture 2 (Full Summary)
📄 Page 1 – Title
- Introduction to MS-based structural proteomics
- Focus: extracting structural and interaction information from proteins using MS
🎯 Page 2 – Learning Objectives
You should be able to:
- Apply MS to protein structure analysis
- Understand HDX, XL-MS, LiP-MS
- Evaluate advantages + limitations
- Interpret real research data
- Solve method-based problems
🧭 Page 3 – Lecture Outline
- Lecture 1: Basics (BUP, TDP, PTMs, disulfides)
- Lecture 2: → HDX (Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange) → XL-MS (Cross-Linking MS) → LiP-MS (Limited Proteolysis MS)
🧠 Page 4 – Big Picture (IMAGE)
The diagram shows:
- A central protein system
- Multiple MS techniques branching out:
- HDX → dynamics
- XL-MS → distances/interactions
- LiP-MS → conformational changes
- Others → PTMs, topology
💡 Key idea: No single method gives full structure → combine methods for systems-level structural proteomics
🔬 PART 1: SURFACE PROBING
🧪 Page 5 – Surface Labeling
- Intact MS = gives mass only, not structure
- Solution: chemical labeling of exposed residues
Types:
- Amine-specific (Lys)
- Carboxyl-specific
- DEPC labeling
- Targets: His, Lys, Tyr, Ser, Thr, Cys
- Adds +72 Da
💡 Interpretation:
- Only accessible residues react → gives surface exposure info
🌊 PART 2: HDX-MS (Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange)
💧 Page 6 – HDX Basics
- Measures exchange: N–H → N–D (backbone amides)
💡 Why backbone?
- Present in all residues → gives global structure info
⚙️ Page 7 – HDX Workflow (IMAGE)
Step-by-step workflow:
- Protein in H₂O
- Transfer to D₂O buffer
- Exchange occurs (H → D)
- Quench (low pH + cold)
- Digest → peptides
- Analyze by MS
Important buffers:
- D₂O buffer → labeling
- Quench buffer (pH 2.3, cold) → stops exchange
💡 Key concept:
- You “freeze” structural information at specific times
⏱ Page 8 – HDX Kinetics
Two regimes:
EX1:
- Fast labeling after unfolding
- All-or-none behavior
EX2:
- Slow exchange
- Depends on probability of opening
💡 Interpretation:
- EX1 → cooperative unfolding
- EX2 → local fluctuations
🔍 Page 9 – Structural Interpretation (IMAGE)
- Heatmaps + spectra show exchange rates
💡 Key rule:
- Fast exchange = exposed / flexible
- Slow exchange = buried / stable
→ You map protein dynamics + solvent accessibility
🌡 Page 10 – Conditions Matter (IMAGE)
Exchange depends on:
- Temperature ↑ → faster exchange
- pH (especially basic conditions)
- Time
💡 Important:
- You must carefully control experimental conditions
⚡ Page 11 – Fragmentation Effects
- ECD (Electron Capture Dissociation) → low scrambling (good)
- CID (Collision-Induced Dissociation) → high scrambling (bad)
💡 Why?
- Scrambling = losing spatial info
Also:
- Back-exchange occurs → reduces signal
🔄 Page 12 – Comparing Proteoforms (IMAGE)
Example: phosphorylation at D55
- Different HDX patterns → structural differences
💡 Use case:
- Detect conformational changes caused by:
- PTMs
- mutations
- ligand binding
🔁 Page 13 – HDX Summary Workflow (IMAGE)
Reinforces:
- D₂O labeling
- Quenching
- Digestion
- MS analysis
🔗 Page 14 – Studying Interactions (IMAGE)
HDX can detect:
- Protein–protein binding
- Ligand binding
- Environmental effects
💡 Interpretation:
- Binding → reduced exchange at interface
☕ Page 15 – Break
(no content)
🔗 PART 3: XL-MS (Cross-Linking MS)
🔗 Page 16 – XL-MS Basics
- Uses bi-functional cross-linkers
- Links two residues
Provides:
- Distance constraints
- Interaction info
💡 Important:
- XL-MS ≠ standalone → used for modeling + network analysis
⚙️ Page 17–18 – XL-MS Workflow (IMAGES)
Workflow:
- Add cross-linker
- Cross-link forms (intra/inter protein)
- Digest into peptides
- MS analysis
- Identify cross-linked peptides
💡 Outcome:
- Distance constraints (~10–30 Å)
⚠️ Page 19 – Complexity
- Many linkers exist
- Trade-off:
- More flexibility → more complexity
🧩 Page 20 – Data Interpretation
Two strategies:
1. Simple linker:
- Mixed fragment spectra → complex analysis
2. Isotope-labeled linker:
- Light + heavy peaks
- Easier to identify cross-links
💡 Trick:
- Mass shift = identify linker-containing fragments
🔀 Page 21 – Inter vs Intra (IMAGE)
- Intra-link → within same protein
- Inter-link → between proteins
💡 Why important?
- Defines interaction networks
✂️ Page 22 – Cleavable Linkers
Example: DSBU
- Breaks during MS
- Reveals individual peptide masses
💡 Advantage:
- Simplifies identification
🧬 Page 23 – MS-Cleavable Linkers
Two modes:
- MS2 identification
- MS3 sequencing
Also:
- Many linkers target Lys (NHS esters)
🔗 Page 24 – Multi-site Crosslinking
- New linkers connect >2 sites
💡 Trade-off:
- More info
- Much harder analysis
🌐 Page 25–26 – XL-MS Applications (IMAGE)
Used for:
- Protein complexes
- Interaction networks
- Structural modeling
🔪 PART 4: LiP-MS (Limited Proteolysis MS)
✂️ Page 27 – LiP-MS Basics
- Use limited proteolysis before digestion
Enzymes:
- Proteinase K (broad specificity)
Key idea:
- Structure determines protease accessibility
💡 Output:
- Structural differences in native state
⚙️ Page 28 – Workflow
- Native protein
- Limited proteolysis
- Full digestion (trypsin)
- MS analysis
💡 Requires:
- Semi-tryptic analysis
🔢 Page 29 – Multiplexing
- Compare multiple conditions in parallel
🧠 FINAL INTEGRATION
🧬 Page 30 – Putting It All Together
Core MS structural methods:
- HDX-MS → dynamics + accessibility
- XL-MS → distances + interactions
- LiP-MS → conformational changes
Complementary methods:
- AP / co-IP → interactions
- TPP → stability
- FPOP → oxidation footprinting
- CPP → surface exposure
💡 Key takeaway: 👉 Structural proteomics = multi-method approach
🎯 Page 31 – Learning Objectives (Revisited)
Confirms:
- You now understand:
- Methods
- Workflows
- Interpretation
📝 Page 32 – Assignment
- Apply concepts
🧩 BIG PICTURE SUMMARY
🧪 What each method tells you:
| Method | Measures | Structural Insight |
|---|---|---|
| HDX-MS | H→D exchange | Dynamics & solvent exposure |
| XL-MS | Cross-links | Distance constraints |
| LiP-MS | Protease cleavage | Conformational changes |
🧠 Key Concepts to Remember
- Faster HDX → more exposed region
- Cross-links → spatial constraints
- LiP cleavage → flexible regions
- No single method is enough → integration is key
Quiz
Score: 0/30 (0%)