Lecture 11 PPT
Absolutely — this is a really important foundation lecture for MS in structural proteomics, and I’ll go through every section/page in a clear, educational way, with extra focus on all spectra and what information they provide.
This lecture mainly covers three major pillars:
- Bottom-up proteomics (BUP) and peptide sequencing
- Top-down proteomics (TDP)
- Post-translational modifications (PTMs) + disulfide mapping
I’ll explain it as if this is your first time seeing the topic.
Lecture 1 — MS for Structural Proteomics
Big picture 🎯
Structural proteomics uses mass spectrometry not only to identify proteins, but to understand:
- sequence
- modifications
- structure
- folding
- connectivity
- interactions
This lecture introduces the core MS logic that everything later builds on.
Pages 1–3: Introduction + learning goals
The course wants you to become comfortable with:
- applied protein MS
- interpreting spectra
- understanding advanced structural methods
- reading research papers
- solving sequencing / modification problems
This is extremely important because later techniques like:
- HDX-MS
- XL-MS
- LiP-MS
all rely on the fundamentals from this lecture.
Page 4: What is proteomics? 🧬
The image shows how biological complexity increases from:
gene → RNA → protein → modified proteins
This is crucial.
A single gene does not equal one protein.
Because of:
- alternative splicing
- processing
- cleavage
- PTMs
one gene can produce many proteoforms.
That is why MS is so powerful.
DNA alone cannot tell you:
- phosphorylation state
- glycosylation
- cleavage products
- disulfide pairing
MS can.
Pages 5 + 18: Modes in classical MS proteomics
This is one of the most important slides.
The spectra here illustrate different analysis strategies.
1) Top-down proteomics
Whole intact protein goes directly into MS.
So the spectrum reflects intact protein ions.
This allows direct study of:
- full protein mass
- PTM combinations
- proteoforms
- truncations
Excellent for structural proteomics.
2) Bottom-up proteomics
Protein is first digested into peptides.
Usually with enzymes like:
- trypsin
- chymotrypsin
Then peptides are analyzed.
This is the most common method.
The spectrum becomes peptide-based.
You identify the protein by reconstructing from peptides.
3) Shotgun proteomics
This is bottom-up applied to complex mixtures.
Many proteins → many peptides → LC-MS/MS.
The spectrum becomes extremely crowded.
This is what modern proteomics typically uses.
What do the spectra tell us here?
The peak patterns visually tell you complexity.
Top-down spectrum
Fewer broader charge-state envelopes.
These correspond to different charge states of the intact protein.
Bottom-up spectrum
Many peptide peaks.
Each peak = peptide ion.
Shotgun
Extremely dense peak forest.
This means many peptides from many proteins.
The main information is sample complexity.
Page 6: Typical BUP workflow 🔬
This image-only slide is very important.
It shows the workflow:
protein sample → digestion → LC separation → MS → database search
Step-by-step
1. Protein extraction
Obtain proteins from cells/tissue.
2. Digestion
Protease cuts proteins into peptides.
Usually trypsin:
cuts after K and R
3. LC separation
Liquid chromatography separates peptides by hydrophobicity.
This reduces complexity before MS.
4. MS1 scan
Measure intact peptide masses.
5. MS2 scan
Selected peptide fragmented.
This gives sequence information.
6. Database search
Software compares observed masses with theoretical peptides.
This is how proteins are identified.
Page 7: Enzymatic digestion restriction
Very important conceptual slide.
Digestion reduces the search space.
Without digestion, the number of possible sequences is enormous.
Digestion makes identification computationally possible.
Example:
A 40 kDa protein is difficult directly.
But tryptic peptides of 7–20 aa are manageable.
This is why digestion is so central.
Page 8: Peptide fragmentation ⚡
Now we enter the most important MS/MS concept.
CID fragmentation
Collision-induced dissociation.
Peptide collides with inert gas.
This breaks peptide bonds.
Mostly gives:
- b-ions
- y-ions
b-ions
Fragments counted from N-terminus
y-ions
Fragments counted from C-terminus
This is absolutely essential.
Pages 9–17: Sequential walking (VERY IMPORTANT) 🧠
This is the core sequencing method.
I’ll explain every spectrum carefully.
What does this spectrum tell us?
The peaks are fragment ions from one peptide.
m/z values:
- 102
- 120
- 207
- 219
- 231
- 318
- 336
- 437
Each peak is a fragment.
By looking at mass differences, we infer amino acids.
This is called sequential walking.
Page 10–11: Start from precursor
Highest peak:
437.1878
Assumed to be intact peptide.
Then compare to next peaks.
Example spectrum interpretation
437.19 - 336.14 = 101.05
This corresponds approximately to Thr (T).
So one residue lost = T.
This means T is one end residue.
That is exactly what the spectrum tells us.
The spectrum gives sequence by difference masses.
What information do spectra give?
This is one of the most important questions you asked.
For every MS/MS spectrum, we get:
1. Sequence information
Mass differences = residue masses
Example:
~101 = Thr
~129 = Glu
~87 = Ser
2. Fragment direction
b-ion vs y-ion tells orientation.
This allows sequence ordering.
3. Modification information
Unexpected mass shifts indicate PTMs.
Later shown with phosphorylation.
Pages 12–16: Full peptide solved
The spectrum eventually gives:
TEST
This is excellent training.
How do we know?
Because differences correspond to:
- T = 101
- E = 129
- S = 87
- T = 101
So sequence becomes:
T-E-S-T
Final annotation
y-series
- y1 = T
- y2 = ST
- y3 = EST
b-series
- b1 = T
- b2 = TE
- b3 = TES
This is exactly what the spectrum reveals.
Important interpretation principle
The peaks themselves are not directly “letters”.
The difference between peaks gives letters.
This is the key idea.
Page 17: Starting from bottom
Same spectrum, alternative reading.
Can start from:
- b1
- y1
instead of precursor.
Same sequence.
Very useful in real spectra.
Pages 19–23: Top-down proteomics 🧬
Now whole proteins.
This is extremely important.
Page 20: Because size matters
This image shows why intact proteins produce many charge states.
Large proteins accept many protons in ESI.
So one protein produces many peaks.
This is called a charge state envelope.
What do these spectra tell us?
This spectrum tells us:
- protein charge states
- molecular weight
- heterogeneity
Each peak corresponds to a different z.
Example:
+53 +54 +55
same protein mass.
Different charge.
Page 23: Exploiting many charges ⭐
Very important spectrum.
The many peaks correspond to same protein with different charges.
Example:
2727.64 2779.10
These are neighboring charge states.
What information do we get?
We calculate:
charge
z = 53
Then molecular mass:
M = mz \cdot z - zH
Result:
147238.5 \text{ Da}
This spectrum gives exact intact protein mass.
This is central in top-down proteomics.
Page 25–27: PTMs 🔥
Very important.
PTMs create proteome complexity.
Examples include:
- phosphorylation
- glycosylation
- acetylation
- oxidation
- methylation
MS is one of the best methods to detect these.
Page 28: Reduction + alkylation
This is extremely important in bottom-up.
Cysteines form disulfide bonds.
These must often be reduced.
Then blocked with carbamidomethylation (CAM).
Why?
To prevent disulfide reshuffling.
Mass shift:
+57.021464
This is one of the most important mass shifts to memorize.
Pages 29–30: Modified peptide spectrum ⭐⭐⭐
This is probably the most important spectrum after sequencing.
Let’s carefully interpret it.
What changed?
Original b3:
318.1296
Modified b3:
398.0956
Difference:
398.0956 - 318.1296 = 79.966
This is classic phosphorylation.
What does this spectrum tell us?
This spectrum gives:
1. existence of PTM
Because fragment mass shifted
2. type of PTM
Mass shift identifies it
+79.966 \approx phosphate
3. position
Because only fragments containing residue 3 shift
Therefore PTM is on AA3.
This is extremely important logic.
Conclusion
AA3 = phosphoserine
This is exactly how phosphoproteomics works.
Pages 31–35: PTM enrichment + large scale biology
These image slides are highly important conceptually.
Page 32: Enrichment
Phosphorylated peptides are rare.
So enrichment is needed.
Methods include:
- IMAC
- TiO₂ enrichment
This enriches phosphopeptides before MS.
Otherwise signals drown in background.
Page 33: Global PTM abundance
This spectrum-like figure shows delta mass distribution.
This tells us which PTMs are common.
Example peaks at characteristic delta masses:
- +16 oxidation
- +57 CAM
- +80 phosphorylation
This is a PTM map.
Very useful globally.
Page 34: Large-scale biology 📊
Heatmaps + barplots.
This shows quantitative PTM biology.
The figures tell us:
- which proteins are modified
- abundance changes
- condition-specific regulation
This is how signaling pathways are studied.
Especially phosphorylation.
Page 35: Complex PTMs
Likely glycosylation-focused.
This is indeed “complex headaches”.
Because glycans create:
- variable branching
- multiple masses
- microheterogeneity
This makes spectra much harder to interpret.
Pages 37–42: Disulfide mapping 🔗
Very important for structural biology.
Disulfide bonds stabilize protein structure.
MS can identify which cysteines are linked.
What happens without reduction?
Disulfide-linked peptides stay connected.
MS measures combined peptide mass.
This reveals connectivity.
Why useful?
Because it gives structural constraints.
Example:
Cys12 linked to Cys89
This gives tertiary structure information.
Very useful in protein folding studies.
In-source reduction + MS3
Very advanced structural MS.
Partially reduce disulfides in ion source.
Then fragment again.
This helps identify exact pairing.
Used for peptides like:
- tertiapin
- growth factors
Both heavily disulfide bonded.
Final big-picture summary 🌟
This lecture teaches the foundations of structural proteomics MS:
Bottom-up
sequence peptides from fragment spectra
Top-down
analyze intact proteins + proteoforms
PTMs
detect + localize modifications
Disulfides
map structural connectivity
The single most important skill from this lecture is:
reading spectra through mass differences
because this logic is reused in every later lecture.